Each citation style has different recommendations for citing generative AI tools like ChatGPT. Either way, you will need to know the following bits of information: The author of the software (software authors are often corporations, not individual people); full title of the software; version that you used; and date that version was published.
Examples:
APA format: OpenAI. (Year). ChatGPT (Month Day version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
APA reference entry: OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Feb 13 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com
APA in-text citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
Examples:
MLA format: “Text of prompt” prompt. ChatGPT, Day Month version, OpenAI, Day Month Year, chat.openai.com.
MLA Works Cited entry: “Explain antibiotics” prompt. ChatGPT, 13 Feb. version, OpenAI, 16 Feb. 2023, chat.openai.com.
MLA in-text citation: ("Explain antibiotics")
Example:
1. Text generated by ChatGPT, March 31, 2023, OpenAI, https://chat.openai.com.
The IEEE Author Center recommends consulting the Chicago Manual of Style for guidance for any usage not included in the IEEE Editorial Style Manual.
If you choose to use ChatGPT or some other AI technology for writing, be sure you are transparent about your use of it with your teachers and publishers and working within their policies.
When AI tools directly impact methodology or findings, cite them. When they simply aid your process, no citation is necessary. Authors retain responsibility for the final published content.
When should I attribute a generative AI tool as part of my process and not for a specific product/resource/etc.? When transparency of process or methodology is important. Consider being transparent about when you used the platform (version, too) and what prompts you used if it is important or ethical to do so.
Example Policy Statements in Syllabi for AI in Higher Education